The role of metrology in AI-enabled digital biomarker research and development

Authors

  • János Pálhalmi DataSenseLabs Ltd.. https://datasenselabs.net/, Budapest, Hungary

Keywords:

digital biomarkers, artificial intelligence, validation, data quality, healthcare technology

Abstract

The article explores the role of metrology in the research and development of digital biomarkers, particularly in the context of artificial intelligence and large language model integration. It highlights the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks as a major barrier to the clinical adoption of digital biomarkers. By introducing a metrology-driven approach, the study proposes systematic methods to ensure traceability, validation, and standardization, thereby fostering trust, interoperability, and industrial scalability of AI-enabled digital biomarker solutions in healthcare.

References

Coravos, A. et al. (2019). Digital biomarkers for health monitoring. NPJ Digital Medicine.. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-019-0090-4

FDA (2018). Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance. https://www.fda.gov/media/70858/download

Powell, D. (2024). Walk, talk, think, see and feel: harnessing the power of digital biomarkers in healthcare. NPJ Digital Medicine. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01023-w

Wilkinson, M. D. et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618

DiMe Society (2023). The Playbook: Digital Clinical Measures. https://playbook.dimesociety.org/

Pálhalmi, J. et al. (2019). A Statistical Metrology Approach to Compare the Quality of Optical Pulse Wave Signals. Computing in Cardiology , Vol 46. DOI: 10.22489/CinC.2019.165 https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/tech-articles/optical-integration-without-compromises.pdf

Tretter, M. et al. (2025). AI-produced certainties in health care: current and future challenges. AI and Ethics. Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-023-00374-6

Bommasani, R. et al. (2022). On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.07258

Chen, S.-Y. et al. (2024). Perceptions of ChatGPT in healthcare: usefulness, trust, and risk. Frontiers in Public Health. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1457131/full

Open mHealth. https://www.openmhealth.org/

PhysioNet. https://physionet.org/

https://www.dbdp.org/

FDA Guidance on Clinical Trials. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents

EURAMET EMN for Health. https://www.euramet.org/metrology-for-societys-challenges/metrology-for-health

Mathews, S. C. et al. (2019). Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ Digital Medicine. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6550273/

Large Language Models for Medical Applications. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025. https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/64598/large-language-models-for-medical-applications

IMDRF SaMD Definitions.

https://www.imdrf.org/documents/software-medical-device-samd-key-definitions

European Medicines Agency:

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/research-development/scientific-advice-protocol-assistance/opinions-letters-support-qualification-novel-methodologies-medicine-development

Pálhalmi, J. et al. (2024). AI-Powered Microscopy Platform for Airborne Biothreat Detection. Springer Nature.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-62083-6_10

Downloads

Published

2025-05-07